A Hypersequent Calculus with Clusters for Data Logic over Ordinals

We study freeze tense logic over well-founded data streams. The logic features past-and future-navigating modalities along with freeze quantifiers, which store the datum of the current position and test data (in)equality later in the formula. We introduce a decidable fragment of that logic, and present a proof system that is sound for the whole logic, and complete for this fragment. Technically, this is a hy-persequent system enriched with an ordering, clusters, and annotations. The proof system is tailored for proof search, and yields an optimal coNP complexity for validity and a small model property for our fragment

Early = Earliest?

Early query answering is the core issue of memory efficient query evaluation on data streams. The idea is to select and reject answer candidates as early as possible on the stream, so that they do not have to be stored in main memory. Since earliest query answering is unfeasible for XPath, as first no- ticed by Benedikt, Jeffrey and Ley-Wild in 2008, most exist- ing streaming algorithms for XPath approximate it in some early manner, while focussing on high time efficiency. Such approximations, however, spoil all theoretical guarantees on memory efficiency. In this paper, we prove that earliest query answering is indeed feasible for positive Forward XPath queries, which have neither unsatisfiable nor valid subqueries. The core in- sight is that a variant of Colmerauer's independence property can be proven for the corresponding fragment of the FXP tree logic. Based on this independence property, we can show that the early query answering algorithm from [13], which is based on a compiler from FXP to early nested word automata, is indeed earliest for all positive FXP0 queries with neither unsatisfiable nor valid subformulas. Further- more, this algorithm outperforms most previous algorithms for XPath evaluation on XML streams in time efficiency and coverage, as shown elsewhere. Available here.</p

A Hypersequent Calculus with Clusters for Tense Logic over Ordinals

Prior\u27s tense logic forms the core of linear temporal logic, with both past- and future-looking modalities. We present a sound and complete proof system for tense logic over ordinals. Technically, this is a hypersequent system, enriched with an ordering, clusters, and annotations. The system is designed with proof search algorithms in mind, and yields an optimal coNP complexity for the validity problem. It entails a small model property for tense logic over ordinals: every satisfiable formula has a model of order type at most omega^2. It also allows to answer the validity problem for ordinals below or exactly equal to a given one

A Hypersequent Calculus with Clusters for Linear Frames

International audienceThe logic Kt4.3 is the basic modal logic of linear frames. Along with its extensions, it is found at the core of linear-time temporal logics and logics on words. In this paper, we consider the problem of designing proof systems for these logics, in such a way that proof search yields decision procedures for validity with an optimal complexity—coNP in this case. In earlier work, Indrzejczak has proposed an ordered hypersequent calculus that is sound and complete for Kt4.3 but does not yield any decision procedure. We refine his approach, using a hypersequent structure that corresponds to weak rather than strict total orders, and using annotations that reflect the model-theoretic insights given by small models for Kt4.3. We obtain a sound and complete calculus with an associated coNP proof search algorithm. These results extend naturally to the cases of unbounded and dense frames, and to the complexity of the two-variable fragment of first-order logic over total orders

XPath-like Query Logics : Proof Systems and Real-World Applicability

Motivées par de nombreuses applications allant du traitement XML à lavérification d'exécution de programmes, de nombreuses logiques sur les arbresde données et les flux de données ont été développées dans la littérature.Celles-ci offrent divers compromis entre expressivité et complexitéalgorithmique ; leur problème de satisfiabilité a souvent une complexité nonélémentaire ou peut même être indécidable.De plus, leur étude à travers des approches de théories des modèles ou dethéorie des automates peuvent être algorithmiquement impraticables ou manquerde modularité.Dans une première partie, nous étudions l'utilisation de systèmes de preuvecomme un moyen modulaire de résoudre le problème de satisfiabilité des données logiques sur des structures linéaires.Pour chaque logique considérée, nous développons un calcul d'hyperséquentscorrect et complet et décrivons une stratégie de recherche de preuve optimaledonnant une procédure de décision NP.En particulier, nous présentons un fragment NP-complet de la logique temporelle sur les ordinaux avec données, la logique complète étant indécidable, qui est exactement aussi expressif que le fragment à deux variables de la logique du premier ordre sur les ordinaux avec données.Dans une deuxième partie, nous menons une étude empirique des principaleslogiques à la XPath décidables proposées dans la littérature.Nous présentons un jeu de tests que nous avons développé à cette fin etexaminons comment ces logiques pourraient être étendues pour capturer davantage de requêtes du monde réel sans affecter la complexité de leur problème de satisfiabilité.Enfin, nous analysons les résultats que nous avons recueillis à partir de notre jeu de tests et identifions les nouvelles fonctionnalités à prendre en charge afin d’accroître la couverture pratique de ces logiques.Motivated by applications ranging from XML processing to runtime verificationof programs, many logics on data trees and data streams have been developed in the literature.These offer different trade-offs between expressiveness and computationalcomplexity; their satisfiability problem has often non-elementary complexity or is even undecidable.Moreover, their study through model-theoretic or automata-theoretic approaches can be computationally impractical or lacking modularity.In a first part, we investigate the use of proof systems as a modular way tosolve the satisfiability problem of data logics on linear structures.For each logic we consider, we develop a sound and complete hypersequentcalculus and describe an optimal proof search strategy yielding an NPdecision procedure.In particular, we exhibit an NP-complete fragment of the tense logic over data ordinals---the full logic being undecidable---, which is exactly as expressive as the two-variable fragment of the first-order logic on data ordinals.In a second part, we run an empirical study of the main decidable XPath-likelogics proposed in the literature.We present a benchmark we developed to that end, and examine how these logicscould be extended to capture more real-world queries without impacting thecomplexity of their satisfiability problem.Finally, we discuss the results we gathered from our benchmark, and identifywhich new features should be supported in order to increase the practicalcoverage of these logics

Logique de requêtes à la XPath : systèmes de preuve et pertinence pratique

Motivated by applications ranging from XML processing to runtime verificationof programs, many logics on data trees and data streams have been developed in the literature.These offer different trade-offs between expressiveness and computationalcomplexity; their satisfiability problem has often non-elementary complexity or is even undecidable.Moreover, their study through model-theoretic or automata-theoretic approaches can be computationally impractical or lacking modularity.In a first part, we investigate the use of proof systems as a modular way tosolve the satisfiability problem of data logics on linear structures.For each logic we consider, we develop a sound and complete hypersequentcalculus and describe an optimal proof search strategy yielding an NPdecision procedure.In particular, we exhibit an NP-complete fragment of the tense logic over data ordinals---the full logic being undecidable---, which is exactly as expressive as the two-variable fragment of the first-order logic on data ordinals.In a second part, we run an empirical study of the main decidable XPath-likelogics proposed in the literature.We present a benchmark we developed to that end, and examine how these logicscould be extended to capture more real-world queries without impacting thecomplexity of their satisfiability problem.Finally, we discuss the results we gathered from our benchmark, and identifywhich new features should be supported in order to increase the practicalcoverage of these logics.Motivées par de nombreuses applications allant du traitement XML à lavérification d'exécution de programmes, de nombreuses logiques sur les arbresde données et les flux de données ont été développées dans la littérature.Celles-ci offrent divers compromis entre expressivité et complexitéalgorithmique ; leur problème de satisfiabilité a souvent une complexité nonélémentaire ou peut même être indécidable.De plus, leur étude à travers des approches de théories des modèles ou dethéorie des automates peuvent être algorithmiquement impraticables ou manquerde modularité.Dans une première partie, nous étudions l'utilisation de systèmes de preuvecomme un moyen modulaire de résoudre le problème de satisfiabilité des données logiques sur des structures linéaires.Pour chaque logique considérée, nous développons un calcul d'hyperséquentscorrect et complet et décrivons une stratégie de recherche de preuve optimaledonnant une procédure de décision NP.En particulier, nous présentons un fragment NP-complet de la logique temporelle sur les ordinaux avec données, la logique complète étant indécidable, qui est exactement aussi expressif que le fragment à deux variables de la logique du premier ordre sur les ordinaux avec données.Dans une deuxième partie, nous menons une étude empirique des principaleslogiques à la XPath décidables proposées dans la littérature.Nous présentons un jeu de tests que nous avons développé à cette fin etexaminons comment ces logiques pourraient être étendues pour capturer davantage de requêtes du monde réel sans affecter la complexité de leur problème de satisfiabilité.Enfin, nous analysons les résultats que nous avons recueillis à partir de notre jeu de tests et identifions les nouvelles fonctionnalités à prendre en charge afin d’accroître la couverture pratique de ces logiques

A Hypersequent Calculus with Clusters for Linear Frames

International audienceThe logic Kt4.3 is the basic modal logic of linear frames. Along with its extensions, it is found at the core of linear-time temporal logics and logics on words. In this paper, we consider the problem of designing proof systems for these logics, in such a way that proof search yields decision procedures for validity with an optimal complexity—coNP in this case. In earlier work, Indrzejczak has proposed an ordered hypersequent calculus that is sound and complete for Kt4.3 but does not yield any decision procedure. We refine his approach, using a hypersequent structure that corresponds to weak rather than strict total orders, and using annotations that reflect the model-theoretic insights given by small models for Kt4.3. We obtain a sound and complete calculus with an associated coNP proof search algorithm. These results extend naturally to the cases of unbounded and dense frames, and to the complexity of the two-variable fragment of first-order logic over total orders

Decidable XPath Fragments in the Real World

XPath is arguably the most popular query language for selecting elements in XML documents. Besides query evaluation, query satisfiability and containment are the main computational problems for XPath; they are useful, for instance, to detect dead code or validate query optimisations. These problems are undecidable in general, but several fragments have been identified over time for which satisfiability (or query containment) is decidable: CoreXPath 1.0 and 2.0 without so-called data joins, fragments with data joins but limited navigation, etc. However, these fragments are often given in a simplified syntax, and sometimes wrt. a simplified XPath semantics. Moreover, they have been studied mostly with theoretical motivations, with little consideration for the practically relevant features of XPath.To investigate the practical impact of these theoretical fragments, we design a benchmark compiling thousands of real-world XPath queries extracted from open-source projects. These queries are then matched against syntactic fragments from the literature. We investigate how to extend these fragments with seldom-considered features such as free variables, data tests, data joins, and the last() and id() functions, for which we provide both undecidability and decidability results. We analyse the coverage of the original and extended fragments, and further provide a glimpse at which other practically-motivated features might be worth investigating in the future